You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender differences in the long-term effects of a nutritional intervention program promoting the Mediterranean diet: changes in dietary intakes, eating behaviors, anthropometric and metabolic variables
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicky Leblanc, Catherine Bégin, Anne-Marie Hudon, Marie-Michelle Royer, Louise Corneau, Sylvie Dodin, Simone Lemieux |
| Abstract |
Long-term adherence to principles of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) following a nutritional intervention promoting the Mediterranean food pattern in Canadian men and women is not known. Moreover, gender differences in dietary and metabolic profile in such an intervention context has never been addressed. Objective was to determine gender differences in long-term effects of a 12-week nutritional intervention program promoting the adoption of the MedDiet and based on the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) on dietary intakes, eating behaviors, anthropometric and metabolic variables, in men and women presenting cardiovascular risk factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,334,164
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#539
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,785
of 361,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.