↓ Skip to main content

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic…

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-12-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujing Xiong, Zhiqin Bu, Wei Dai, Meixiang Zhang, Xiao Bao, Yingpu Sun

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the impact of LH supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. No significant difference in outcomes between LH supplementation and r-FSH alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI with GnRH antagonist protocol is currently present, and further studies are necessary for more solid conclusions on pregnancy likelihood to be drawn.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 9 30%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%