↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-3-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelle G van Minnen, Bart J Strengers, Bas Eickhout, Rob J Swart, Rik Leemans

Abstract

Carbon plantations are introduced in climate change policy as an option to slow the build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. Here we present a methodology to evaluate the potential effectiveness of carbon plantations. The methodology explicitly considers future long-term land-use change around the world and all relevant carbon (C) fluxes, including all natural fluxes. Both issues have generally been ignored in earlier studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 154 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 27 16%
Other 9 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 9%
Engineering 9 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,145,112
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#84
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,921
of 88,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them