↓ Skip to main content

Fair relationships and policies to support family day care educators’ mental health: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fair relationships and policies to support family day care educators’ mental health: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Corr, Elise Davis, Kay Cook, Elizabeth Waters, Anthony D LaMontagne

Abstract

High quality child care is a population health investment that relies on the capacity of providers. The mental health and wellbeing of child care educators is fundamental to care quality and turnover, yet sector views on the relationship between working conditions and mental health and wellbeing are scarce. This paper examines child care educators' and sector key informants' perspectives on how working in family day care influences educator's mental health and wellbeing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,258,121
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,341
of 17,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,005
of 372,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#149
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.