↓ Skip to main content

Self-reported adult footwear and the risks of lower limb osteoarthritis: the GOAL case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-reported adult footwear and the risks of lower limb osteoarthritis: the GOAL case control study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel F McWilliams, Stella Muthuri, Kenneth R Muir, Rose A Maciewicz, Weiya Zhang, Michael Doherty

Abstract

Biomechanical factors may play a role in osteoarthritis (OA) development and progression. Previous biomechanical studies have indicated that types of footwear may modulate forces across the knee joint, and high heeled womens' shoes in particular are hypothesised to be detrimental to lower limb joint health. This analysis of data from a case control study investigated persistent users of different adult footwear for risks of knee and hip OA. Our underlying hypotheses were that high heeled, narrow heeled, and hard soled shoe types were putative risk factors for lower limb OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Engineering 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,275,499
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,191
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,686
of 250,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.