↓ Skip to main content

An integrated transcriptome and expressed variant analysis of sepsis survival and death

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated transcriptome and expressed variant analysis of sepsis survival and death
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13073-014-0111-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ephraim L Tsalik, Raymond J Langley, Darrell L Dinwiddie, Neil A Miller, Byunggil Yoo, Jennifer C van Velkinburgh, Laurie D Smith, Isabella Thiffault, Anja K Jaehne, Ashlee M Valente, Ricardo Henao, Xin Yuan, Seth W Glickman, Brandon J Rice, Micah T McClain, Lawrence Carin, G Ralph Corey, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Charles B Cairns, Ronny M Otero, Vance G Fowler, Emanuel P Rivers, Christopher W Woods, Stephen F Kingsmore

Abstract

Sepsis, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, is not a homogeneous disease but rather a syndrome encompassing many heterogeneous pathophysiologies. Patient factors including genetics predispose to poor outcomes, though current clinical characterizations fail to identify those at greatest risk of progression and mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 33%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 22 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,759,865
of 20,952,692 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#392
of 1,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,917
of 344,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#20
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,952,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.