↓ Skip to main content

Hemispheric biases and the control of visuospatial attention: an ERP study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemispheric biases and the control of visuospatial attention: an ERP study
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, August 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-6-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin M Spencer, Marie T Banich

Abstract

We examined whether individual differences in hemispheric utilization can interact with the intrinsic attentional biases of the cerebral hemispheres. Evidence suggests that the hemispheres have competing biases to direct attention contralaterally, with the left hemisphere (LH) having a stronger bias than the right hemisphere. There is also evidence that individuals have characteristic biases to utilize one hemisphere more than the other for processing information, which can induce a bias to direct attention to contralateral space. We predicted that LH-biased individuals would display a strong rightward attentional bias, which would create difficulty in selectively attending to target stimuli in the left visual field (LVF) as compared to right in the performance of a bilateral flanker task.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 43 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 40%
Neuroscience 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,779,219
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#164
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,748
of 58,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them