↓ Skip to main content

Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0220-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debapriya Mondal, Tamara S Galloway, Trevor C Bailey, Fiona Mathews

Abstract

Stillbirth rates have changed little over the last decade, and a high proportion of cases are unexplained. This meta-analysis examined whether there are inequalities in stillbirth risks according to sex.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#419,731
of 19,153,137 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#339
of 2,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,828
of 330,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#32
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,153,137 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.