You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiovascular risks and elevation of serum DHT vary by route of testosterone administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0211-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen E Borst, Jonathan J Shuster, Baiming Zou, Fan Ye, Huanguang Jia, Anita Wokhlu, Joshua F Yarrow |
Abstract |
Potential cardiovascular (CV) risks of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) are currently a topic of intense interest. However, no studies have addressed CV risk as a function of the route of administration of TRT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Other | 18 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,156,719
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,417
of 3,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,167
of 365,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#32
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.