↓ Skip to main content

Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4345
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F Ten Cate, Jolanda J Luime, Myrthe van der Ven, Johanna MW Hazes, Klazina Kooiman, Nico de Jong, Johannes G Bosch

Abstract

In many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subclinical disease activity can be detected with ultrasound (US), especially using power Doppler US (PDUS). However, PDUS may be highly dependent on the type of machine. This could create problems both in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice. To clarify how the PDUS signal differs between machines we created a microvessel flow phantom.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Engineering 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Psychology 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#9,968,371
of 12,451,992 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,717
of 1,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,232
of 282,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,451,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.