You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What happens to lost nets: a multi-country analysis of reasons for LLIN attrition using 14 household surveys in four countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-464 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hannah Koenker, Albert Kilian, Celine Zegers de Beyl, Emmanuel O Onyefunafoa, Richmond A Selby, Tarekegn Abeku, Megan Fotheringham, Matthew Lynch |
Abstract |
While significant focus has been given to net distribution, little is known about what is done with nets that leave a household, either to be used by others or when they are discarded. To better understand the magnitude of sharing LLIN between households and patterns of discarding LLIN, the present study pools data from 14 post-campaign surveys to draw larger conclusions about the fate of nets that leave households. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Sweden | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Sudan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 23% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,572,122
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#558
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,075
of 371,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#11
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.