↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of a follicular nodule (Thy3) outcome of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology among Saudi patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of a follicular nodule (Thy3) outcome of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology among Saudi patients
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2943-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imad R. Musa, Mukhtar El khatim Ahmad, Fayez Salim Al Raddady, Wesal Rabih Al Rabih, Elsayed M. Elsayed, Gussay Badawi Mohamed, Gasim I. Gasim

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate predictors of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) outcomes among Saudis with a thyroid nodule. Socio-demographic data, thyroid function status, thyroid parameters, ultrasound and cytology results were collected from 269 files of patients with thyroid nodules. The patients' age was 40 ± 1.4 years (mean ± SD), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.3 ± 1.2 kg/m(2). The thyroid statuses were euthyroid (85.5%), hypothyroidism (7.4%) and hyperthyroidism (7.1%). Young age, an absence of irradiation history, and multinodular goitre were protective against Thy3 [(OR = 0.05, CI = 003-0.6, P = 0.024), (OR = 0.4, CI = 0.2-0.8, P = 0.012) and (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.2-5.3, P = 0.016), respectively]; a lower FT3 was protective against Thy4 (OR = 0.4, CI = 0.2-0.99, P = 0.046), the absence of cervical lymphadenopathy was associated with Thy2 (OR = 2.7, CI = 1.4-5, P = 0.001), and a solid nodule was associated with Thy2 and Thy3 [(OR = 1.2, CI = 0.3-0.97, P = 0.040) and (OR = 2.2, CI = 1-4.8, P = 0.039), respectively]. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, multinodular goitre, an absence of irradiation history and cervical lymphadenopathy were protective against Thy3 [(OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.002-0.96, P = 0.047), (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.0-5.60, P = 0.039), (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.16-0.94, P = 0.036) and (O R = 0.39, 95% CI = 1-5.6, P = 0.039), respectively]. In summary, younger age, multinodular goitre, the absence of an irradiation history and cervical lymphadenopathy were protective against Thy3 in a thyroid nodule.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 9 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,483,707
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,334
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,346
of 438,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#79
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.