You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jørn Wetterslev, Per Winkel, Theis Lange, Christian Gluud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 43% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,323,476
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#143
of 2,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,913
of 371,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.