You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Determining the mechanisms underlying augmented renal drug clearance in the critically ill: use of exogenous marker compounds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-014-0657-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew A Udy, Paul Jarrett, Janine Stuart, Melissa Lassig-Smith, Therese Starr, Rachel Dunlop, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Belgium | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 46% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,338,695
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,444
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,813
of 369,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#65
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.