You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protective effect of breastfeeding with regard to children’s behavioral and cognitive problems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Subin Park, Bung-Nyun Kim, Jae-Won Kim, Min-Sup Shin, Hee Jeong Yoo, Soo-Churl Cho |
Abstract |
Breastfeeding has been associated with a lower risk for behavioral problems in childhood. However, it is uncertain whether these associations are mediated by the mother's or child's IQ. We examined the association between breastfeeding and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other behavioral problems in childhood and assessed the role of the child's IQ and the mother's IQ in generating this association. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 46% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 19% |
Psychology | 17 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,386,479
of 24,074,720 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#544
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,788
of 370,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,074,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.