↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of proliferation and apoptosis markers in circulating tumor cells of women with early breast cancer who are candidates for tumor dormancy

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of proliferation and apoptosis markers in circulating tumor cells of women with early breast cancer who are candidates for tumor dormancy
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13058-014-0485-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Spiliotaki, Dimitris Mavroudis, Kyriaki Kapranou, Harris Markomanolaki, Galatea Kallergi, Filippos Koinis, Kostas Kalbakis, Vassilis Georgoulias, Sofia Agelaki

Abstract

IntroductionClinical dormancy is frequently observed in breast cancer. In the present study, we aimed to characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in dormancy candidates (DC) with early breast cancer in terms of proliferation and apoptosis.MethodsCytospins of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from DC (n =122) who were disease-free for at least five years and from metastatic patients (n =40) who relapsed more than five years after surgery. Sequential samples from eight DC (n =36) who maintained a prolonged disease-free status and from eight DC (n =27) presenting late relapse during follow-up, were also analyzed. PBMCs were triple stained with a pancytokeratin, antibody along with anti-Ki67 and anti-M30 antibodies as proliferation and apoptosis markers, respectively.ResultsCTCs were identified in 40 (33%) of 122 DC and in 15 (37.5%) of 40 metastatic patients. In total 25 (62.5%) DC had exclusively dormant (Ki67(-)/M30(-)), 7 (17.5%) had proliferative Ki67(+)/M30(-), 4 (10%) had apoptotic Ki67(-)/M30(+) and 4 (10%) had both phenotypes of proliferative and apoptotic CTCs. In comparison, 53.4% of CTC-positive metastatic patients had exclusively dormant and 46.6% had proliferative CTCs; none had apoptotic CTCs (P =0.039). Among all CTCs detected in DC patients, 82.4% were dormant, whereas in the non-dormant population, 32.5% were proliferative and 67.5% apoptotic. The respective percentages in metastatic patients were 59.1%, 100% and 0% (P <0.0001). Moreover, apoptotic CTCs prevailed among non-dormant CTCs detected in sequential samples from DC who remained in a prolonged disease-free status compared to those presenting late relapse during follow-up (70.6% versus 43.5% (P =0.0002)).ConclusionsThe apoptotic index of CTCs is increased during clinical dormancy, whereas the proliferation index is increased on relapse. In addition, apoptotic CTCs are more frequently encountered during follow-up in DC patients who remain disease¿free compared to those with subsequent late relapse, suggesting that monitoring proliferation and apoptosis in CTCs during clinical dormancy merits further investigation as a tool for predicting late disease recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#728
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,105
of 369,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.