You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of movement control tests on the cervical spine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maja Patroncini, Susanne Hannig, André Meichtry, Hannu Luomajoki |
| Abstract |
Movement control impairment reduces active control of movement. Patients with this might form an important subgroup among patients with mechanical cervical pain. Diagnosis is based on the observation of active movement tests. Although widely used clinically, few studies have been performed to determine the reliability of a test battery. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-tester reliability of movement control impairment [MCI] tests on the cervical spine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,929,378
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#394
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,823
of 361,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.