Title |
Designing effective visualizations of habits data to aid clinical decision making
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-014-0102-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joost de Folter, Hulya Gokalp, Joanna Fursse, Urvashi Sharma, Malcolm Clarke |
Abstract |
BackgroundChanges in daily habits can provide important information regarding the overall health status of an individual. This research aimed to determine how meaningful information may be extracted from limited sensor data and transformed to provide clear visualization for the clinicians who must use and interact with the data and make judgments on the condition of patients. We ascertained that a number of insightful features related to habits and physical condition could be determined from usage and motion sensor data.MethodsOur approach to the design of the visualization follows User Centered Design, specifically, defining requirements, designing corresponding visualizations and finally evaluating results. This cycle was iterated three times.ResultsThe User Centered Design method was successfully employed to converge to a design that met the main objective of this study. The resulting visualizations of relevant features that were extracted from the sensor data were considered highly effective and intuitive to the clinicians and were considered suitable for monitoring the behavior patterns of patients.ConclusionsWe observed important differences in the approach and attitude of the researchers and clinicians. Whereas the researchers would prefer to have as many features and information as possible in each visualization, the clinicians would prefer clarity and simplicity, often each visualization having only a single feature, with several visualizations per page. In addition, concepts considered intuitive to the researchers were not always to the clinicians. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
India | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 30% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |