You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Carroll, Andrew Booth, Katy Cooper |
| Abstract |
A variety of different approaches to the synthesis of qualitative data are advocated in the literature. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of a pragmatic method of qualitative evidence synthesis and the lessons learned from adopting this "best fit" framework synthesis approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 377 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 18% |
| Researcher | 60 | 15% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 67 | 17% |
| Psychology | 36 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 15% |
| Unknown | 103 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,109,748
of 25,116,143 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#286
of 2,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,595
of 113,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,116,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.