↓ Skip to main content

Detailed characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in two distinct human solid malignancies show phenotypic similarities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detailed characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in two distinct human solid malignancies show phenotypic similarities
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40425-014-0038-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Lana Chisholm, Jonna Vercellini, Christopher G Tucker, Ryan Montler, Daniel Haley, Philippa Newell, Jun Ma, Paul Tseng, Ronald Wolf, John T Vetto, Chet Hammill, Paul Hansen, Andrew D Weinberg

Abstract

We examined the phenotype and function of lymphocytes collected from the peripheral blood (PBL) and tumor (TIL) of patients with two different solid malignancies: colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and ovarian cancer (OVC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Other 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,339,368
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,384
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,798
of 369,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.