↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide screening and functional analysis identify a large number of long noncoding RNAs involved in the sexual reproduction of rice

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
459 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide screening and functional analysis identify a large number of long noncoding RNAs involved in the sexual reproduction of rice
Published in
Genome Biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0512-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Chan Zhang, Jian-You Liao, Ze-Yuan Li, Yang Yu, Jin-Ping Zhang, Quan-Feng Li, Liang-Hu Qu, Wen-Sheng Shu, Yue-Qin Chen

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in a wide range of biological processes in mammals and plants. However, the systematic examination of lncRNAs in plants lags behind that in mammals. Recently, lncRNAs have been identified in Arabidopsis and wheat; however, no systematic screening of potential lncRNAs has been reported for the rice genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 303 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 24%
Researcher 61 19%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 4%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 67 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 21%
Computer Science 6 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 80 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,835,472
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,525
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,397
of 368,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#34
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.