↓ Skip to main content

Risk behaviors and sports facilities do not explain socioeconomic differences in childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk behaviors and sports facilities do not explain socioeconomic differences in childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romana Albaladejo, Rosa Villanueva, Lourdes Navalpotro, Paloma Ortega, Paloma Astasio, Enrique Regidor

Abstract

To assess whether the relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic context of residence and childhood obesity is explained by family socioeconomic position, risk behaviors and availability of sports facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,924,721
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,038
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,677
of 362,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.