↓ Skip to main content

Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: an intervention study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: an intervention study
Published in
Environmental Health, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-9-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lotte Jacobs, Tim S Nawrot, Bas de Geus, Romain Meeusen, Bart Degraeuwe, Alfred Bernard, Muhammad Sughis, Benoit Nemery, Luc Int Panis

Abstract

Numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated adverse health effects of a sedentary life style, on the one hand, and of acute and chronic exposure to traffic-related air pollution, on the other. Because physical exercise augments the amount of inhaled pollutants, it is not clear whether cycling to work in a polluted urban environment should be encouraged or not. To address this conundrum we investigated if a bicycle journey along a busy commuting road would induce changes in biomarkers of pulmonary and systematic inflammation in a group of healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 221 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Student > Master 35 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 19%
Environmental Science 29 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 9%
Sports and Recreations 20 9%
Engineering 17 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,891,352
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#598
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,902
of 100,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.