You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study design and methods for the Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine M Friedenreich, Sarah MacLaughlin, Heather K Neilson, Frank Z Stanczyk, Yutaka Yasui, Aalo Duha, Brigid M Lynch, Ciara Kallal, Kerry S Courneya |
| Abstract |
Exercise has favorable effects on biomarkers associated with a lower risk of breast cancer, however it is unclear if higher doses of exercise provide additional effects. No clinical trial has systematically examined how different exercise volumes influence the mechanisms underlying breast cancer etiology. The Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA) - a follow-up study to the Alberta Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Prevention (ALPHA) Trial - is examining how a one-year, high versus moderate volume aerobic exercise intervention influences several biomechanisms hypothesized to influence breast cancer risk in a group of postmenopausal women. Secondary aims are to compare intervention effects on psychosocial and quality of life outcomes as well as understand exercise adherence at 12 and 24 months, and maintenance of all study outcomes at 24 months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 103 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 13% |
| Psychology | 34 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 111 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,985,998
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,459
of 8,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,274
of 359,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#36
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.