↓ Skip to main content

CBFA: phenotype prediction integrating metabolic models with constraints derived from experimental data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CBFA: phenotype prediction integrating metabolic models with constraints derived from experimental data
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12918-014-0123-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Carreira, Pedro Evangelista, Paulo Maia, Paulo Vilaça, Marcellinus Pont, Jean-François Tomb, Isabel Rocha, Miguel Rocha

Abstract

BackgroundFlux analysis methods lie at the core of Metabolic Engineering (ME), providing methods for phenotype simulation that allow the determination of flux distributions under different conditions. Although many constraint-based modeling software tools have been developed and published, none provides a free user-friendly application that makes available the full portfolio of flux analysis methods.ResultsThis work presents Constraint-based Flux Analysis (CBFA), an open-source software application for flux analysis in metabolic models that implements several methods for phenotype prediction, allowing users to define constraints associated with measured fluxes and/or flux ratios, together with environmental conditions (e.g. media) and reaction/gene knockouts. CBFA identifies the set of applicable methods based on the constraints defined from user inputs, encompassing algebraic and constraint-based simulation methods. The integration of CBFA within the OptFlux framework for ME enables the utilization of different model formats and standards and the integration with complementary methods for phenotype simulation and visualization of results.ConclusionsA general-purpose and flexible application is proposed that is independent of the origin of the constraints defined for a given simulation. The aim is to provide a simple to use software tool focused on the application of several flux prediction methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
China 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Computer Science 5 9%
Engineering 4 7%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,184,450
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#452
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,676
of 360,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#16
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.