↓ Skip to main content

Clinical neurophysiological assessment of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical neurophysiological assessment of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0674-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koji Hosokawa, Nicolas Gaspard, Fuhong Su, Mauro Oddo, Jean-Louis Vincent, Fabio Silvio Taccone

Abstract

IntroductionSeveral studies have reported the presence of electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities or altered evoked potentials (EPs) during sepsis. However, the role of these tests in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy remains unclear.MethodsWe performed a systematic search for studies evaluating EEG and/or EPs in adult (¿18 years) patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. The following outcomes were extracted: a) incidence of EEG/EP abnormalities; b) diagnosis of sepsis-associated delirium or encephalopathy with EEG/EP; c) outcome.ResultsAmong 1976 citations, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of EEG abnormalities during sepsis ranged from 12% to 100% for background abnormality and 6% to 12% for presence of triphasic waves. Two studies found that epileptiform discharges and electrographic seizures were more common in critically ill patients with than without sepsis. In one study, EEG background abnormalities were related to the presence and the severity of encephalopathy. Background slowing or suppression and the presence of triphasic waves were also associated with higher mortality. A few studies demonstrated that quantitative EEG analysis and EP could show significant differences in patients with sepsis compared to controls but their association with encephalopathy and outcome was not evaluated.ConclusionsAbnormalities in EEG and EPs are present in the majority of septic patients. There is some evidence to support EEG use in the detection and prognostication of sepsis-associated encephalopathy, but further clinical investigation is needed to confirm this suggestion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 45 26%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 49%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Engineering 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,191,334
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,993
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,351
of 368,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#48
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.