↓ Skip to main content

Laterally transferred elements and high pressure adaptation in Photobacterium profundum strains

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laterally transferred elements and high pressure adaptation in Photobacterium profundum strains
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-6-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Campanaro, Alessandro Vezzi, Nicola Vitulo, Federico M Lauro, Michela D'Angelo, Francesca Simonato, Alessandro Cestaro, Giorgio Malacrida, Giulio Bertoloni, Giorgio Valle, Douglas H Bartlett

Abstract

Oceans cover approximately 70% of the Earth's surface with an average depth of 3800 m and a pressure of 38 MPa, thus a large part of the biosphere is occupied by high pressure environments. Piezophilic (pressure-loving) organisms are adapted to deep-sea life and grow optimally at pressures higher than 0.1 MPa. To better understand high pressure adaptation from a genomic point of view three different Photobacterium profundum strains were compared. Using the sequenced piezophile P. profundum strain SS9 as a reference, microarray technology was used to identify the genomic regions missing in two other strains: a pressure adapted strain (named DSJ4) and a pressure-sensitive strain (named 3TCK). Finally, the transcriptome of SS9 grown under different pressure (28 MPa; 45 MPa) and temperature (4 degrees C; 16 degrees C) conditions was analyzed taking into consideration the differentially expressed genes belonging to the flexible gene pool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 30%
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2020.
All research outputs
#17,734,890
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,555
of 10,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,080
of 58,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.