↓ Skip to main content

Should we look for silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should we look for silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis?
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria José García-Fuster, Maria José Fabia, Elena Furió, Gernot Pichler, Josep Redon, Maria José Forner, Fernando Martínez

Abstract

Asymptomatic or silent pulmonary embolism (S-PE) in patients with deep vein thrombosis has been the focus of numerous publications with the objective of determining the incidence of S-PE and assessing whether its existence has any clinical or therapeutic consequences that outweigh the risks associated with the diagnostic tests performed and the increased healthcare costs. The objectives were to assess the incidence of S-PE using computed tomography angiogram (CTA), to understand the epidemiological factors that might trigger embolism, and to assess whether D-dimer (DD) predicts the existence of S-PE's.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 76%
Engineering 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,735,148
of 19,101,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#284
of 1,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,843
of 328,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#36
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,101,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.