↓ Skip to main content

Associations between breakfast eating habits and health-promoting lifestyle, suboptimal health status in Southern China: a population based, cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Associations between breakfast eating habits and health-promoting lifestyle, suboptimal health status in Southern China: a population based, cross sectional study
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12967-014-0348-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jieyu Chen, Jingru Cheng, Yanyan Liu, Yang Tang, Xiaomin Sun, Tian Wang, Ya Xiao, Fei Li, Lei Xiang, Pingping Jiang, Shengwei Wu, Liuguo Wu, Ren Luo, Xiaoshan Zhao

Abstract

Suboptimal health status (SHS) is the intermediate health state between health and disease, refers to medically undiagnosed or functional somatic syndromes, and has been a major global public health challenge. However, both the etiology and mechanisms associated with SHS are still unclear. Breakfast eating behavior is a dietary pattern marker and previous studies have presented evidence of associations between failure to consume breakfast and increased diseases. Accordingly, in view of the significance of breakfast eating behaviors with respect to health status, the associations between breakfast eating habits and healthy lifestyle, SHS require further elucidation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 22%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 33 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,062,595
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#213
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,508
of 369,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#5
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.