You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of commercial energy shots on response time and power output in recreational cyclists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-014-0056-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John G Seifert, David A Connor |
| Abstract |
Caffeine based energy shot products accounted for $1.3 billion in sales in 2011. Caffeine has been shown to confer numerous benefits during exercise and is oftentimes combined with ingredients such as carbohydrates and taurine in the hope of further performance improvement. The purpose of this project was to compare auditory response time, power output, and physiological responses between the ingestion of a CHO, PRO, caffeine supplement (CPC), a caffeine-taurine-niacin based supplement (CTN), and a placebo (PL) in commercially formulated products that make claims as to improving performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| South Africa | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,247,421
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#293
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,008
of 432,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#278
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.