↓ Skip to main content

Generalized joint hypermobility in childhood is a possible risk for the development of joint pain in adolescence: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generalized joint hypermobility in childhood is a possible risk for the development of joint pain in adolescence: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12887-014-0302-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oline Sohrbeck-Nøhr, Jens Halkjær Kristensen, Eleanor Boyle, Lars Remvig, Birgit Juul-Kristensen

Abstract

BackgroundThere is some evidence that indicates generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a risk factor for pain persistence and recurrence in adolescence. However, how early pain develops and whether GJH without pain in childhood is a risk factor for pain development in adolescence is undetermined. The aims for this study were to investigate the association between GJH and development of joint pain and to investigate the current GJH status and physical function in Danish adolescents.MethodsThis was a longitudinal cohort study nested within the Copenhagen Hypermobility Cohort. All children (n¿=¿301) were examined for the exposure, GJH, using the Beighton test at baseline at either 8 or 10 years of age and then re-examined when they reached 14 years of age. The children were categorized into two groups based on their number of positive Beighton tests using different cut points (i.e. GJH4 defined as either¿<¿4 or¿¿¿4, GJH5 and GJH6 were similarly defined). The outcome of joint pain was defined as arthralgia as measured by the Brighton criteria from the clinical examination. Other outcome measures of self-reported physical function and objective physical function were also collected.ResultsChildren with GJH had three times higher risk of developing joint pain in adolescence, although this association did not reach statistical significance (GJH5: 3.00, 95% [0.94-9.60]). At age 14, the adolescents with GJH had significantly lower self-reported physical function (for ADL: GJH4 p¿=¿0.002, GJH5 p¿=¿0.012; for pain during sitting: GJH4 p¿=¿0.002, GJH5 p¿=¿0.018) and had significantly higher body mass index (BMI: GJH5 p¿=¿0.004, GJH6 p¿=¿0.006) than adolescents without GJH. There was no difference in measured physical function.ConclusionThis study has suggested a possible link between GJH and joint pain in the adolescent population. GJH was both a predictive and a contributing factor for future pain. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Sports and Recreations 7 9%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,725,411
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,239
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,016
of 361,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.