↓ Skip to main content

Provider cost analysis supports results-based contracting out of maternal and newborn health services: an evidence-based policy perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Provider cost analysis supports results-based contracting out of maternal and newborn health services: an evidence-based policy perspective
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Hatcher, Shiraz Shaikh, Hassan Fazli, Shehla Zaidi, Atif Riaz

Abstract

There is dearth of evidence on provider cost of contracted out services particularly for Maternal and Newborn Health (MNH). The evidence base is weak for policy makers to estimate resources required for scaling up contracting. This paper ascertains provider unit costs and expenditure distribution at contracted out government primary health centers to inform the development of optimal resource envelopes for contracting out MNH services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,723,781
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,791
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,768
of 258,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#87
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.