You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Subliminal versus supraliminal stimuli activate neural responses in anterior cingulate cortex, fusiform gyrus and insula: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40359-014-0052-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paolo Meneguzzo, Manos Tsakiris, Helgi B Schioth, Dan J Stein, Samantha J Brooks |
Abstract |
Non-conscious neural activation may underlie various psychological functions in health and disorder. However, the neural substrates of non-conscious processing have not been entirely elucidated. Examining the differential effects of arousing stimuli that are consciously, versus unconsciously perceived will improve our knowledge of neural circuitry involved in non-conscious perception. Here we conduct preliminary analyses of neural activation in studies that have used both subliminal and supraliminal presentation of the same stimulus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Serbia | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,930,186
of 24,254,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#376
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,206
of 369,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,254,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.