↓ Skip to main content

AKE - the Accelerated k-mer Exploration web-tool for rapid taxonomic classification and visualization

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AKE - the Accelerated k-mer Exploration web-tool for rapid taxonomic classification and visualization
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0384-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Langenkämper, Alexander Goesmann, Tim Wilhelm Nattkemper

Abstract

BackgroundWith the advent of low cost, fast sequencing technologies metagenomic analyses are made possible. The large data volumes gathered by these techniques and the unpredictable diversity captured in them are still, however, a challenge for computational biology.ResultsIn this paper we address the problem of rapid taxonomic assignment with small and adaptive data models (< 5 MB) and present the accelerated k-mer explorer (AKE). Acceleration in AKE¿s taxonomic assignments is achieved by a special machine learning architecture, which is well suited to model data collections that are intrinsically hierarchical. We report classification accuracy reasonably well for ranks down to order, observed on a study on real world data (Acid Mine Drainage, Cow Rumen).ConclusionWe show that the execution time of this approach is orders of magnitude shorter than competitive approaches and that accuracy is comparable. The tool is presented to the public as a web application (url: https://ani.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/ake/, username: bmc, password: bmcbioinfo).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
Sweden 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Computer Science 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Engineering 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,734,890
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,927
of 7,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,988
of 354,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#111
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.