↓ Skip to main content

Primary Care Triple P for parents of NICU graduates with behavioral problems: a randomized, clinical trial using observations of parent–child interaction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary Care Triple P for parents of NICU graduates with behavioral problems: a randomized, clinical trial using observations of parent–child interaction
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12887-014-0305-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renske Schappin, Lex Wijnroks, Monica Uniken Venema, Barbara Wijnberg-Williams, Ravian Veenstra, Corine Koopman-Esseboom, Susanne Mulder-De Tollenaer, Ingeborg van der Tweel, Marian Jongmans

Abstract

BackgroundPreterm-born or asphyxiated term-born children show more emotional and behavioral problems at preschool age than term-born children without a medical condition. It is uncertain whether parenting intervention programs aimed at the general population, are effective in this specific group. In earlier findings from the present trial, Primary Care Triple P was not effective in reducing parent-reported child behavioral problems. However, parenting programs claim to positively change child behavior through enhancement of the parent¿child interaction. Therefore, we investigated whether Primary Care Triple P is effective in improving the quality of parent¿child interaction and increasing the application of trained parenting skills in parents of preterm-born or asphyxiated term-born preschoolers with behavioral problems.MethodsFor this pragmatic, open randomized clinical trial, participants were recruited from a cohort of infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of two Dutch hospitals. Children aged 2¿5 years, with a gestational age <32 weeks and/or birth weight <1500 g and children with a gestational age 37¿42 weeks and perinatal asphyxia were included. After screening for a t-score ¿60 on the Child Behavior Checklist, children were randomly assigned to Primary Care Triple P (n = 34) or a wait-list control group (n = 33). Trial outcomes were the quality of parent¿child interaction and the application of trained parenting skills, both scored from structured observation tasks.ResultsThere was no effect of the intervention on either of the observational outcome measures at the 6-month trial endpoint.ConclusionsPrimary Care Triple P, is not effective in improving the quality of parent¿child interaction nor does it increase the application of trained parenting skills in parents of preterm-born or asphyxiated term-born children with behavioral problems. Further research should focus on personalized care for these parents, with an emphasis on psychological support to reduce stress and promote self-regulation.Trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register NTR2179. Registered 26 January 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 65 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,792,181
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,907
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,060
of 354,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.