↓ Skip to main content

The quantity, quality and characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian mentoring literature: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The quantity, quality and characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian mentoring literature: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxanne Bainbridge, Komla Tsey, Janya McCalman, Simon Towle

Abstract

Mentoring is a key predictor of empowerment and prospectively a game changer in the quest to improve health inequities. This systematic review reports on the state of evidence on mentoring for Indigenous Australians by identifying the quantity, nature, quality and characteristics of mentoring publications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Librarian 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Psychology 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,941,081
of 4,637,332 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,910
of 5,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,958
of 151,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,637,332 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.