↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1287
Pubmed ID
Authors

John N Lavis, Jennifer A Boyko, Francois-Pierre Gauvin

Abstract

Deliberative dialogues have recently captured attention in the public health policy arena because they have the potential to address several key factors that influence the use of research evidence in policymaking. We conducted an evaluation of three deliberative dialogues convened in Canada by the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy in order to learn more about deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 18%
Psychology 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,201,341
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,635
of 17,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,828
of 349,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#40
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.