You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1287 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John N Lavis, Jennifer A Boyko, Francois-Pierre Gauvin |
Abstract |
Deliberative dialogues have recently captured attention in the public health policy arena because they have the potential to address several key factors that influence the use of research evidence in policymaking. We conducted an evaluation of three deliberative dialogues convened in Canada by the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy in order to learn more about deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 7 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Senegal | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 19% |
Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 19% |
Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 48 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 18% |
Psychology | 20 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 15% |
Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,201,341
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,635
of 17,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,828
of 349,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#40
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.