↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide motif predictions of BCARR-box in the amino-acid repressed genes of Lactobacillus helveticus CM4

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide motif predictions of BCARR-box in the amino-acid repressed genes of Lactobacillus helveticus CM4
Published in
BMC Microbiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12866-017-1125-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoyuki Yamamoto, Taketo Wakai

Abstract

A BCARR (branched-chain amino acid responsive repressor) identified in proteolytic gene expressions in Lactobacillus helveticus is considered to negatively control transcriptions by binding to operator sites at the promoter regions in the presence of BCAAs. However, the distributions and regulatory potential of the BCARR in all genes repressed by BCAAs in CM4 remains unclear. A genome-wide search for the BCARR-box was conducted to clarify the contribution of BCARR in the regulation of amino acid metabolism in L. helveticus CM4. Among all 2174 genes of CM4, 390 genes repressed by amino acids were selected for the search of the BCARR-box. The annotated 33 genes among the 67 predicted BCARR-boxes were mainly linked to amino acid metabolism. The BCARR-boxes were mainly located adjacent to the -35 sequence of the promoter; however, the repressive effects in different locations were similar. Notably, the consensus BCARR-box motif, 5'-A1A2A3A4A5W6N7N8N9W10T11T12W13T14T15-3', observed in highly repressed genes, revealed more frequent A-T base pairing and a lower free energy than that in lowly repressed genes. A MEME analysis also supported the lower frequency of T at positions 12, 14, 13 and 15 in the BCARR-box sequence of the lowly repressed gene group. These results reveal that genes with a more stable palindromic structure might be preferable targets for BCARR binding and result in higher repressions in the target gene expressions. Our genome-wide search revealed the involvement of the proteolytic system, transporter system and some transcriptional regulator systems in BCARR-box regulation in L. helveticus CM4.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Engineering 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,260
of 3,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,932
of 438,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.