You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie Wolff, Claire Parker, Jaimie Borisoff, W Ben Mortenson, Johanne Mattie |
| Abstract |
Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users' health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was undertaken to explore perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on reasons for use of exoskeleton technology, and the importance of a variety of device characteristics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 80 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,875,754
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#77
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,743
of 353,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.