↓ Skip to main content

Patient safety skills in primary care: a national survey of GP educators

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient safety skills in primary care: a national survey of GP educators
Published in
BMC Primary Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12875-014-0206-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Ahmed, Sonal Arora, John McKay, Susannah Long, Charles Vincent, Moya Kelly, Nick Sevdalis, Paul Bowie

Abstract

BackgroundClinicians have a vital role in promoting patient safety that goes beyond their technical competence. The qualities and attributes of the safe hospital doctor have been explored but similar work within primary care is lacking. Exploring the skills and attributes of a safe GP may help to inform the development of training programmes to promote patient safety within primary care.PurposeTo determine the views of General Practice Educational Supervisors (GPES) regarding the qualities and attributes of a safe General Practitioner (GP) and the perceived trainability of these `safety skills¿ and to compare selected results with those generated by a previous study of hospital doctors.MethodsThis was a two-stage study comprising content validation of a safety skills questionnaire (originally developed for hospital doctors)(Stage 1) and a prospective survey of all GPES in Scotland (n¿=¿691)(Stage 2).ResultsStage 1: The content-validated questionnaire comprised 66 safety skills/attributes across 17 broad categories with an overall content validation index of 0.92.Stage 2: 348(50%) GPES completed the survey. GPES felt the skills/attributes most important to being a safe GP were honesty(93%), technical clinical skills(89%) and conscientiousness(89%). That deemed least important/relevant to being a safe GP was leadership(36%). This contrasts sharply with the views of hospital doctors in the previous study. GPES felt the most trainable safety skills/attributes were technical skills (93%), situation awareness(75%) and anticipation/preparedness(71%). The least trainable were honesty(35%), humility(33%) and patient awareness/empathy(30%). Additional safety skills identified as relevant to primary care included patient advocacy, negotiation skills, accountability/ownership and clinical intuition (`listening to that worrying little inner voice¿).ConclusionsGPES believe a broad range of skills and attributes contribute to being a safe GP. Important but subtle differences exist between what primary care and secondary care doctors perceive as core safety attributes. Educationalists, GPs and patient safety experts should collaborate to develop and implement training in these skills to ensure that current and future GPs possess the necessary competencies to engage and lead in safety improvement efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,538,136
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#476
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,332
of 347,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.