↓ Skip to main content

The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
692 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
755 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, October 2005
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-2-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Sommer

Abstract

Genetic studies have typically inferred the effects of human impact by documenting patterns of genetic differentiation and levels of genetic diversity among potentially isolated populations using selective neutral markers such as mitochondrial control region sequences, microsatellites or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). However, evolutionary relevant and adaptive processes within and between populations can only be reflected by coding genes. In vertebrates, growing evidence suggests that genetic diversity is particularly important at the level of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). MHC variants influence many important biological traits, including immune recognition, susceptibility to infectious and autoimmune diseases, individual odours, mating preferences, kin recognition, cooperation and pregnancy outcome. These diverse functions and characteristics place genes of the MHC among the best candidates for studies of mechanisms and significance of molecular adaptation in vertebrates. MHC variability is believed to be maintained by pathogen-driven selection, mediated either through heterozygote advantage or frequency-dependent selection. Up to now, most of our knowledge has derived from studies in humans or from model organisms under experimental, laboratory conditions. Empirical support for selective mechanisms in free-ranging animal populations in their natural environment is rare. In this review, I first introduce general information about the structure and function of MHC genes, as well as current hypotheses and concepts concerning the role of selection in the maintenance of MHC polymorphism. The evolutionary forces acting on the genetic diversity in coding and non-coding markers are compared. Then, I summarise empirical support for the functional importance of MHC variability in parasite resistance with emphasis on the evidence derived from free-ranging animal populations investigated in their natural habitat. Finally, I discuss the importance of adaptive genetic variability with respect to human impact and conservation, and implications for future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 3 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 710 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 169 22%
Researcher 145 19%
Student > Master 115 15%
Student > Bachelor 86 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 6%
Other 102 14%
Unknown 93 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 431 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 13%
Environmental Science 42 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 2%
Other 42 6%
Unknown 111 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,941,019
of 23,758,679 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#289
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,524
of 60,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,679 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.