↓ Skip to main content

Histone modifications involved in cassette exon inclusions: a quantitative and interpretable analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histone modifications involved in cassette exon inclusions: a quantitative and interpretable analysis
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Liu, Ting Jin, Jihong Guan, Shuigeng Zhou

Abstract

Chromatin structure and epigenetic modifications have been shown to involve in the co-transcriptional splicing of RNA precursors. In particular, some studies have suggested that some types of histone modifications (HMs) may participate in the alternative splicing and function as exon marks. However, most existing studies pay attention to the qualitative relationship between epigenetic modifications and exon inclusion. The quantitative analysis that reveals to what extent each type of epigenetic modification is responsible for exon inclusion is very helpful for us to understand the splicing process.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 48%
Computer Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2014.
All research outputs
#10,647,130
of 16,638,522 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,614
of 9,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,475
of 310,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#121
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,638,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.