↓ Skip to main content

Improved self-management skills in Chinese diabetes patients through a comprehensive health literacy strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved self-management skills in Chinese diabetes patients through a comprehensive health literacy strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wang Hong Xu, Russell L Rothman, Rui Li, Yingyao Chen, Qinghua Xia, Hong Fang, Junling Gao, Yujie Yan, Peng Zhou, Yu Jiang, Yinan Liu, Fangjia Zhou, Wei Wang, Minling Chen, Xiao Yu Liu, Xiao Na Liu

Abstract

Diabetes self-management often involves the interpretation and application of oral, written, or quantitative information. Numerous diabetes patients in China have limited health literacy, which likely leads to poorer clinical outcomes. This study is designed to examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of addressing health literacy to improve self-management skills and glycemic control in Chinese diabetes patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 332 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 18%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 96 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Psychology 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 107 32%