↓ Skip to main content

Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing failure to rescue

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing failure to rescue
Published in
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13022-014-0009-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renee L Arlow, Dirk F Moore, Chunxia Chen, John Langenfeld, David A August

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the system and technical factors that enabled our moderate size transhiatal esophagectomy program to achieve low mortality rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Computer Science 5 31%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,543,511
of 8,614,918 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#9
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,484
of 245,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,614,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them