↓ Skip to main content

28 days of creatine nitrate supplementation is apparently safe in healthy individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
28 days of creatine nitrate supplementation is apparently safe in healthy individuals
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-014-0060-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan M Joy, Ryan P Lowery, Paul H Falcone, Matt M Mosman, Roxanne M Vogel, Laura R Carson, Chih-Yin Tai, David Choate, Dylan Kimber, Jacob A Ormes, Jacob M Wilson, Jordan R Moon

Abstract

Creatine monohydrate has become a very popular nutritional supplement for its ergogenic effects. The safety of creatine monohydrate has previously been confirmed. However with each novel form of creatine that emerges, its safety must be verified. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the safety of a novel form of creatine, creatine nitrate (CN), over a 28 day period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,719,357
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#381
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,009
of 438,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#368
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.