↓ Skip to main content

The influence of thyroid dysfunction on bone metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Thyroid Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of thyroid dysfunction on bone metabolism
Published in
Thyroid Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13044-014-0012-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominika Tuchendler, Marek Bolanowski

Abstract

Loss of bone mineral density due to osteoporosis is the main cause of fragility fractures and leads to dropped quality of life and increased mortality. Disturbance of balance between bone formation and bone resorption is dangerous, can cause loss of bone mass and disruption of it's architecture. Correct development, achievement of peak bone mass and normal functioning of human skeleton depend on different factors. The pivotal role in bone metabolism play thyroid hormones. Both excess as well as deficiency of fT4 and fT3 can be potentially deleterious for bone tissue. The aim of this study is to review the current literature concerning the role of thyroid hormones on bone metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#482,088
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Thyroid Research
#2
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,548
of 353,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thyroid Research
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.