You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seeing the forests and the trees—innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-88 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noah Ivers, Andrea C Tricco, Thomas A Trikalinos, Issa J Dahabreh, Kristin J Danko, David Moher, Sharon E Straus, John N Lavis, Catherine H Yu, Kaveh Shojania, Braden Manns, Marcello Tonelli, Timothy Ramsay, Alun Edwards, Peter Sargious, Alison Paprica, Michael Hillmer, Jeremy M Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,410
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,414
of 246,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.