You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandra van Dulmen, Emmy Sluijs, Liset van Dijk, Denise de Ridder, Rob Heerdink, Jozien Bensing |
Abstract |
Patients' non-adherence to medical treatment remains a persistent problem. Many interventions to improve patient adherence are unsuccessful and sound theoretical foundations are lacking. Innovations in theory and practice are badly needed. A new and promising way could be to review the existing reviews of adherence to interventions and identify the underlying theories for effective interventions. That is the aim of our study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 760 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
Portugal | 3 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
Other | 6 | <1% |
Unknown | 722 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 144 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 16% |
Researcher | 96 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 78 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 7% |
Other | 171 | 23% |
Unknown | 100 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 228 | 30% |
Psychology | 98 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 54 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 45 | 6% |
Other | 154 | 20% |
Unknown | 130 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#608,644
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#112
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#925
of 74,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.