↓ Skip to main content

Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
449 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
760 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-7-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra van Dulmen, Emmy Sluijs, Liset van Dijk, Denise de Ridder, Rob Heerdink, Jozien Bensing

Abstract

Patients' non-adherence to medical treatment remains a persistent problem. Many interventions to improve patient adherence are unsuccessful and sound theoretical foundations are lacking. Innovations in theory and practice are badly needed. A new and promising way could be to review the existing reviews of adherence to interventions and identify the underlying theories for effective interventions. That is the aim of our study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 760 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 722 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 144 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 16%
Researcher 96 13%
Student > Bachelor 78 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 7%
Other 171 23%
Unknown 100 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 228 30%
Psychology 98 13%
Social Sciences 54 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 45 6%
Other 154 20%
Unknown 130 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#608,644
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#112
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#925
of 74,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.