↓ Skip to main content

Chronic pain associated with the Chikungunya Fever: long lasting burden of an acute illness

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic pain associated with the Chikungunya Fever: long lasting burden of an acute illness
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Sylvain Jean, Pierre Clavelou, Radhouane Dallel, Didier Bouhassira

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is responsible for major epidemics worldwide. Autochthonous cases were recently reported in several European countries. Acute infection is thought to be monophasic. However reports on chronic pain related to CHIKV infection have been made. In particular, the fact that many of these patients do not respond well to usual analgesics suggests that the nature of chronic pain may be not only nociceptive but also neuropathic. Neuropathic pain syndromes require specific treatment and the identification of neuropathic characteristics (NC) in a pain syndrome is a major step towards pain control.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,358,064
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#676
of 8,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,762
of 98,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.