You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why carers use adult day respite: a mixed method case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine M Stirling, Corinna A Dwan, Angela R McKenzie |
| Abstract |
We need to improve our understanding of the complex interactions between family carers' emotional relationships with care-recipients and carers use of support services. This study assessed carer's expectations and perceptions of adult day respite services and their commitment to using services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,313,289
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,551
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,622
of 228,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#94
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.